Harvard Biologist Stephen J. Gould’s “non-overlapping magisteria” argument presented by the AAAS:
Blog Stats
- 2,890,248 readers since June 2008
Recent Comments
- godisreal2017 on “Male and Female Created He Them!”: Was Adam a Hermaphrodite? And Does That Explain How Eve Could Be Taken from Adam’s Body?
- godisreal2017 on “Male and Female Created He Them!”: Was Adam a Hermaphrodite? And Does That Explain How Eve Could Be Taken from Adam’s Body?
- godisreal2017 on “Male and Female Created He Them!”: Was Adam a Hermaphrodite? And Does That Explain How Eve Could Be Taken from Adam’s Body?
- godisreal2017 on “Male and Female Created He Them!”: Was Adam a Hermaphrodite? And Does That Explain How Eve Could Be Taken from Adam’s Body?
- godisreal2017 on “Male and Female Created He Them!”: Was Adam a Hermaphrodite? And Does That Explain How Eve Could Be Taken from Adam’s Body?
- Anonymous on Clit Rubbing Bonobos: A Clue to the Evolutionary Origin of Human Homosexuality?
- twilighto on Clit Rubbing Bonobos: A Clue to the Evolutionary Origin of Human Homosexuality?
- ANSWER THE QUESTIONS - Essay Classes on Feminism for Beginners
- What does Lee Smolin mean when he says that the most fundamental theory can have no symmetries? – GrindSkills on Lee Smolin’s Time Reborn: Physics, Evolution, Atheism, and Buddhism
- Anon on Hanger 18: 1950s Military Clerk-Typist, June Crane, Claims That There Were Alien Bodies Stored at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio
- ra on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Mars on Clit Rubbing Bonobos: A Clue to the Evolutionary Origin of Human Homosexuality?
- lastunicorn5 on In 1935, Were Cary Grant and Randolf Scott Sex Partners? No, But These Images Look Rather Camp
- Rhianna on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Nevaeh on Matthew 27:51-53: The Bible’s “Night of the Living Dead” Passage
Top Posts
- Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Clit Rubbing Bonobos: A Clue to the Evolutionary Origin of Human Homosexuality?
- Walt Whitman: "To be indeed a God!"
- From the BBC Documentary, "The Day I Died": Pam Reynolds's Truly Mind Blowing Near Death Experience
- Quote of the Day
- Two Interesting UFO Documents: The "Smith Memo" (1950) and Physicist Robert Sarbacher's 1983 Letter
- What, Exactly, Is Wrong With Bestiality?
- Who Is Stephen Greenblatt? Why Should You Care?
- Dissipation-Driven Adaptive Organization: Is Jeremy England The Next Charles Darwin?
- Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
-
Recent Posts
Recent Haiku Tweets
- @abrahampiper Yahweh as a frustrated deity, much to be pitied! Abraham Piper's insight here, if thought about as a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 year ago
- RT @tbonier: More than 80M votes cast and we're not done yet. Thoughts: - It's too late for an "October surprise" to have a significant imp… 1 year ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: 1. Want to thank @DanielNewman for using his HUGE platform for this work. I want to clarify what this is. In the voter… 1 year ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: Tell me again about how old and feeble Joe Biden is??? twitter.com/ProjectLincoln… 2 years ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: Remember when you had a chance to choose country over party and you chose party @SenatorCollins? Well, @ProjectLincol… 2 years ago
-
Prometheus Unbound 
Do you find Gould’s argument about nonoverlapping magisteria convincing?
I have read about his argument, but have not read his book. My impression is that it is probably not convincing because science and religion do overlap. It is hard to hold that they do not.
In my own conversations with people about evolution and theology, my impression is that the way people generally manage to believe in both God and evolution involves some degree of skepticism towards (or incomplete understanding of) the argument that natural selection is sufficient to explain the origin of species.
Ken,
Like you, I personally find the “overlapping magisteria” argument, if not dubious, at least questionable—but I thought the video is worth seeing, so I posted it.
I think very highly of Gould and his books (perhaps because they are so “literary”).
I also think that scientists have to, as a practical matter, do a song and dance of the sort depicted in the video so that the public doesn’t develop an equation of science with Dawkins-like atheism or agnosticism.
Beyond keeping creationism out of the public schools, money is at stake—the funding for projects etc.
As for natural selection as “sufficient to explain the origin of species,” I’m not sure why that should be a reason to do away with God. Maybe God set out a mechanism, in advance, that works in accord with the laws of nature, to produce complex organisms (“be fruitful and multiply”).
It’s just an awfully bloody and violent mechanism, isn’t it?
It all always seems to come back to the problem of mass death and suffering.
Hearing that Gould’s writing is literary makes me want to read his work.
I think you explanation of the reason for the video makes sense. Believing that natural selection is sufficient to explain the origin of species does not in itself lead to harsh criticism of religion, nor even, in the minds of many, to atheism.
Although I think you are right that one can believe in God and evolution by believing that evolution is a mechanism set out by God, I think that evolution (meaning origin of the species through natural selection) can be understood as a nonreligious view of the world, interpreting the word “religion” as many religion scholars have, including Frazer, Freud, Marx as well as Otto and Eliade. (Personally, I am most sympathetic to Eliade’s interpretation. It seems fair to say that the view that natural selection is sufficient to explain the origin of species is a nonreligious view of things as he uses the word religion.)
As you have written here, I think what makes almost all of us shudder is the suffering and death that marks the struggle for life at the heart of natural selection, of which each of us is a survivor, temporarily.
ken,
nobody gets out alive.