Confidence Atheism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Don Quixote

I think that, in large part, the reason people sometimes use the phrases “fundamentalist atheist” or “militant atheist” to describe contemporary atheists has to do with the high expression of confidence expressed by some atheists. Like fundamentalists who express a high degree of confidence on matters for which high confidence is (to put it politely) not warranted, so there are contemporary atheists who come across as more confident in their own beliefs than the evidence warrants. In the face of the enormous mysteries, enigmas, and perplexities of existence, expressions of confidence come across as being akin to religious certitude—and hence fundamentalist. Perhaps fundamentalist is the wrong word—but it is not entirely the wrong word. The analogy may be imperfect, but it is not wholly absent of meaning or relevance to the contemporary atheist phenomenon.

Perhaps “triumphalist” is a better word for describing some contemporary atheists. People who are triumphalist display outsized confidence in the essential correctness of their way of seeing the world and display little irony or self-doubt about it. You never get the impression from a triumphalist that he or she might spend any time seriously wondering if maybe he or she is wrong. And a triumphalist would not be caught dead “wasting time” reading the books of the other side—except perhaps to gather fodder for ridicule or apologetics. And triumphalists—whether of the religious or secular varieties—are really good at cognitive dissonance. Their triumphalism is at once sunny and utterly disproportionate to the reality of their actual situation.

So perhaps “Don Quixote atheist” is another way to refer to the triumphalist atheist. It is not unusual to encounter atheists who are living in a fantasy world that is impervious to anything outside of it. And circular reasoning keeps everything out that the Don Quixote atheist wants to keep out. To the Don Quixote atheist, everything in Atheist Land is rosy. Its leaders are outsized in their moral rectitude and intellectual vision, and the sun shines clear. There are no problems worth bothering about, and no difficulties (only apparent ones). To the triumphalist or Don Quixote atheist, the pessimistic atheist—or the atheist or agnostic who is a sympathetic listener and dialoguer with theists—or the atheist who is dubious of the leaders of the new atheist movement—has not absorbed how wonderful pure atheism is. It really is like being in an Ayn Rand-style cult for some contemporary atheists. There are outsized charismatic leaders, an obsession with purity, and an image (largely delusionary) of one’s ideology and movement being free of taint when practiced confidently, fully, and without apology.

About Santi Tafarella

I teach writing and literature at Antelope Valley College in California.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Confidence Atheism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Don Quixote

  1. joe says:

    “so there are contemporary atheists who come across as more confident in their own beliefs than the evidence warrants.”

    Can you explain what you think these beliefs are?

    • Santi Tafarella says:

      Sure, if you say, “God doesn’t exist,” that’s beyond what the evidence warrants. The evidence only warrants that you can have a hypothesis that God doesn’t exist. There are other possibilities that also accord with the evidence. Agnosticism is, therefore, the more reasonable option (over atheism or theism).

      Furthermore, if you’re an atheist other beliefs necessarily follow, such as this one: that the universe we experience came into existence from nothing or has always existed or was birthed out of another universe (three things one can potentially conclude from what evidence we have and support philosophically, but that one cannot, strictly speaking, empirically establish).

      Logical possibilities are multiple and can all be made to accord with the facts, but only one thing, on any given question, is true. But atheists, like theists, have to tell themselves a story (because they’re at once committed and embedded in the system they’re trying to account for).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s