Michael Shermer and his gang of skeptical inquirers look like they’re channeling the Sopranos. And in the word “skeptologist” I feel a vague association with “exorcist.” I don’t know if this show is ever going beyond the pilot stage—or if any network is biting—but here’s the teaser for it. I bet it would be good, and might even get decent ratings, if Shermer could get the backing:
Blog Stats
- 2,800,133 readers since June 2008
Recent Comments
- Anonymous on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Answer the questions | Philosophy homework help - Prime Paper Help on Feminism for Beginners
- Answer the questions | Philosophy homework help - assignmentsbay on Feminism for Beginners
- Larry on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Anonymous on Trump’s New Cancel Culture: Cancelling Black Voters
- bluecat57 on Trump’s New Cancel Culture: Cancelling Black Voters
- Santi Tafarella on A Meditation Explainer for Poets and Environmentalists
- Michael CJ on What is an Etiological Narrative? And Might Confusion About Its Nature Be the Source for Fundamentalist Religion?
- Shaun on America’s Largest Cult: 64% of Evangelicals Hold to the Young Earth Creationist Belief That “God created humans pretty much in their present form at one time in the last 10,000 years or so.”
- Anonymous on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- notabilia on A Meditation Explainer for Poets and Environmentalists
- Santi Tafarella on A Meditation Explainer for Poets and Environmentalists
- prismpromise on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- notabilia on A Meditation Explainer for Poets and Environmentalists
- Santi Tafarella on A Meditation Explainer for Poets and Environmentalists
Top Posts
- Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Bearing Witness to the Holocaust: The Toilet Facilities at Auschwitz
- In 1935, Were Cary Grant and Randolf Scott Sex Partners? No, But These Images Look Rather Camp
- Clit Rubbing Bonobos: A Clue to the Evolutionary Origin of Human Homosexuality?
- Walt Whitman: "To be indeed a God!"
- UFOs, Aliens, and Religious Art
- Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
- Dissipation-Driven Adaptive Organization: Is Jeremy England The Next Charles Darwin?
- Our Daily Stanza: The First Six Lines of William Wordsworth's "I wandered lonely as a Cloud" (1807)
- What, Exactly, Is Wrong With Bestiality?
-
Recent Posts
Recent Haiku Tweets
- RT @tbonier: More than 80M votes cast and we're not done yet. Thoughts: - It's too late for an "October surprise" to have a significant imp… 2 months ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: 1. Want to thank @DanielNewman for using his HUGE platform for this work. I want to clarify what this is. In the voter… 4 months ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: Tell me again about how old and feeble Joe Biden is??? twitter.com/ProjectLincoln… 5 months ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: Remember when you had a chance to choose country over party and you chose party @SenatorCollins? Well, @ProjectLincol… 5 months ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: Trump cares more about dead traitors than live patriots. RT this @votevets ad & tell your followers https://t.co/OD5Z… 5 months ago
Shermer? Bah, I’m a Brian Dunning fan.
(Dr. Novella’s okay too.)
I’m hoping “The Skeptologists” will get picked up by a good station, will become a runaway hit, and eventually will help turn the tide of TV land as we know it.
Obviously, these days most or all of the science-based TV stations are actually pseudoscience-based TV stations. (Check out “Is It Real?” on National Geographic for proof of that.) This is beyond annoying–it’s disillusioning–and it’s time that trend of BS comes to an end. Let’s get rid of “Ghost Hunters” and air in its place “Ghost Hunter Hunters.”
So, where is this show? I don’t understand. How a network or a station or DirecTV cannot see the potential here is nuts. In the very least, it’ll get great ratings because it’ll be controversial. Most TV watchers (or so it seems) love the paranormal and pseudoscience, and they’ll probably tune it just to object to science and skepticism!
In the very least, it’s been years since this pilot was announced. Why hasn’t it been leaked?