YEC Watch: Albert Mohler says “the world indeed looks old” and “evolutionary arguments” appear “credible.” But the Bible’s explanations of natural phenomena “should be compelling to believers.”

Albert Mohler, the man Time magazine has called America’s “reigning intellectual in the evangelical movement”, is a young earth creationist. (Yes, it appears that you can be a “reigning intellectual” and still think the earth is about 6,000 years old. You didn’t know that, did you?) 

In any case, a recent blog post by Darrel Falk, President of BioLogos, calls Albert Mohler out on the preposterous notion that, in the 21st century, you can ever really be a serious intellectual and a young earth creationist at the same time. Albert Mohler’s young earth creationism, says Dr. Falk, is:

[A] view that takes on the entire scientific enterprise.

And what is Albert Mohler’s retort? Well, at his own blog this week, Mohler appears to agree:

As I have stated repeatedly, I accept without hesitation the fact that the world indeed looks old. Armed with naturalistic assumptions, I would almost assuredly come to the same conclusions as BioLogos and the evolutionary establishment, or I would at least find evolutionary arguments credible. But the most basic issue is, and has always been, that of worldview and basic presuppositions. The entire intellectual enterprise of evolution is based on naturalistic assumptions, and I do not share those presuppositions. Indeed, the entire enterprise of Christianity is based on supernaturalistic, rather than merely naturalistic, assumptions. There is absolutely no reason that a Christian theologian should accept the uniformitarian assumptions of evolution. In fact, given a plain reading of Scripture, there is every reason that Christians should reject a uniformitarian presupposition. The Bible itself offers a very different understanding of natural phenomena, with explanations that should be compelling to believers. In sum, there is every reason for Christians to view the appearance of the cosmos as graphic evidence of the ravages of sin and the catastrophic nature of God’s judgment upon sin.

Translation: The world indeed looks old. Reality testing suggests that a reasonable person should probably conclude that it is old. But the Bible says it’s not. The Bible’s alternative narrative, even where it blatantly contradicts the straightforward discoveries of science, “should be compelling to believers.”

And what should compel them? Obviously, the logic derived from within the biblical texts themselves, accepted wholly by faith and one’s inner witness that they are true. That’s Mohler’s epistemic “presupposition” that scientists don’t bring into the lab or field with them. Put simply: God said it, I believe it, and that settles it.

Isn’t that what Albert Mohler is affirming here? When push comes to shove, the Christian should keep with the Bible program, submitting to its inner logic and ignoring outside sources of information. The believer should do this even when the outside information comes from a process of painstaking scientific investigation.

In other words, like the most fanatic Muslim fundamentalist, Albert Mohler is saying that one’s reading of the Book of Nature must submit itself to a plain and literal reading of the Book of God.

Period.

But could there be anything more cultish and intellectually bankrupt than to do this? I mean, seriously. If this isn’t “a view that takes on the entire scientific enterprise,” what is?

About Santi Tafarella

I teach writing and literature at Antelope Valley College in California.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to YEC Watch: Albert Mohler says “the world indeed looks old” and “evolutionary arguments” appear “credible.” But the Bible’s explanations of natural phenomena “should be compelling to believers.”

  1. Zia says:

    That is why I found it funny that he was labeled as the “reigning intellectual in the evangelical movement” in the previous post.
    These views if established will set us back compared to the rest of the world. Luckily, the true scientist (the ones that matter) do not accept this view. I know, some will attack me on this, but as I tell my biology students, There is no democracy in science.
    You either have solid empirical data or you do not.

    Sani, please keep up the YEC watch, I can use it in y classes.

  2. Christ's Angel says:

    I’m looking to hitch a ride to Sedna when it is closer c. 2075 ADP to catch up on some music arranging, hopefully learn to play the violin, too. The orbit of Sedna is c. 10,500 years.

  3. Pingback: YEC Watch: Are Albert Mohler’s YEC Views “Thought Crimes” or Crimes Against Thought? | Prometheus Unbound

  4. Pingback: On YEC and Hell, Albert Mohler Takes Up the Evangelical’s Burden | Prometheus Unbound

  5. Pingback: On YEC and Hell, Albert Mohler Takes Up the Evangelical’s Burden | Prometheus Unbound

  6. Pingback: Hell Apologists Watch: Albert Mohler wants people to awake “in the morning” and go “to sleep at night with the fear of hell never far from consciousness” | Prometheus Unbound

  7. Pingback: The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it: Albert Mohler’s circular reasoning merry-go-round | Prometheus Unbound

  8. Pingback: Naturalism, Supernaturalism, and Motivated Reasoning | Prometheus Unbound

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s