Michelle Malkin gets wound up defaming her fellow conservatives for stating the obvious: the Romney 47% video may prove to be a mortal blow for Republicans up and down the ticket this year.
___________
Blog Stats
- 2,346,390 readers since June 2008
Recent Comments
- Janis on How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- Ken Detweiler on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- patternsofsouldevelopment on What is a Human, Really? Thinking about Definition via Aristotle
- Steve Waclo on What is a Human, Really? Thinking about Definition via Aristotle
- JB on Matthew 27:51-53: The Bible’s “Night of the Living Dead” Passage
- caroline on Yucef Nadarkhani Execution Watch: The White House Press Secretary’s Press Release
- Santi Tafarella on Distract, Maul, And Dominate: Donald Trump’s CNN Wrestling Video GIF Is Hitler’s Reichstag Fire
- Mary on Distract, Maul, And Dominate: Donald Trump’s CNN Wrestling Video GIF Is Hitler’s Reichstag Fire
- Anonymous on Distract, Maul, And Dominate: Donald Trump’s CNN Wrestling Video GIF Is Hitler’s Reichstag Fire
- Mary on Distract, Maul, And Dominate: Donald Trump’s CNN Wrestling Video GIF Is Hitler’s Reichstag Fire
- Vincent on What Does It Mean For God To Exist, Think, And Act?
- Santi Tafarella on What Does It Mean For God To Exist, Think, And Act?
- Santi Tafarella on What Does It Mean For God To Exist, Think, And Act?
- Sam on Was Jesus the Only One to Rise from the Dead on Easter Weekend?
- Vincent on What Does It Mean For God To Exist, Think, And Act?
Top Posts
- Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- What is a Human, Really? Thinking about Definition via Aristotle
- How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- What, Exactly, Is Wrong With Bestiality?
- Love is Worth Fighting For: A Little Life Lesson from Perseus and the Medusa
- Ludwig Wittgenstein for Beginners
- Camus in a Nutshell: God is Not Good, Nature is Not Good, and We are More Moral Than God or Nature
- Matthew 27:51-53: The Bible's "Night of the Living Dead" Passage
- Neuroscientist David Eagleman calls himself a possibilian. What's that?
- How Many People Could the Ancient Colosseum in Rome Hold?
-
Recent Posts
- Distract, Maul, And Dominate: Donald Trump’s CNN Wrestling Video GIF Is Hitler’s Reichstag Fire
- What Does It Mean For God To Exist, Think, And Act?
- Trump and Authoritarianism
- The Enlightenment Under Attack: Free Desiree Fairooz
- “Siloviki”: Yale’s Timothy Snyder Nails The Stakes Surrounding Trump’s Firing Of James Comey
Recent Haiku Tweets
- Perfect. twitter.com/newsundayheral… 6 months ago
- RT @goldenglobes: At tonight's #GoldenGlobes we honor Hollywood legend Meryl Streep with the prestigious Cecil B. Demille Award. https://t.… 6 months ago
- If Trump establishes a Muslim registry, and calls on Muslims to provide their names, this agnostic will be joining them. #registerasamuslim 8 months ago
- #DonaldPGroper Donald P. Groper. Donald Trump is done, right? 9 months ago
- #DonaldPGrabber Donald P. Grabber. Donald Trump is done. 9 months ago
Ah … why does Fox think that clip of Obama is some shocking, smoking gun? Aside from the shout out to the union movement and Populists, which I suppose is enough to put a twist in the knickers of already wound-up right wingers, the whole thing is as American, and as bland, as apple pie. Gotta give props to Michelle Malkin. Wish I could breathe fire and speak in full sentences like she does. Feisty!
One funny part, around the 1:20 mark, is where Hannity bemoans as scandalous the fact that Obama openly favors “the common good”–code, I suppose, for communism.
One nation, under 47%, divisible. (And the church said, “Amen.”)
–Santi
I can never figure out if folks like Hannity and Malkin, when they talk like that, are really serious … or if it is just their way of keeping the eyeballs on themselves and the dollars flowing in. Of course, it seems, many of their viewers do take them seriously. I like Jon Stewart better. At least he labels his jokes as jokes, and if the court jester happens to stumble across the truth, well that’s a nice side benefit.
Of course, they’re Machiavellians. They’re laughing all the way to the bank and have to have the most stunning contempt for the intelligence of their audiences. How could they not?
It’s a show, a persona, that they adopt. It’s feigned outrage. On some things they may feel their own outrage–the liar believes his own lies–but most of the time they’re just ginning it up. That’s my theory.
I’ll recommend a book that perhaps contradicts me, but it is very, very good: “The Righteous Mind.” Maybe they do believe themselves more than I suppose. You can find the book at Amazon, if you’re curious.
–Santi