Below is one of the most amazing interview clips you’ll ever see. Tom Ricks, one of America’s most respected (and feared) investigative journalists, lasts 60 beautiful seconds on Fox News before the producer realizes he’s off script and shuts him down. This belongs in the category of, “Speak truth to power until your power goes out.”
Blog Stats
- 2,882,710 readers since June 2008
Recent Comments
- What does Lee Smolin mean when he says that the most fundamental theory can have no symmetries? – GrindSkills on Lee Smolin’s Time Reborn: Physics, Evolution, Atheism, and Buddhism
- Anon on Hanger 18: 1950s Military Clerk-Typist, June Crane, Claims That There Were Alien Bodies Stored at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio
- ra on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Mars on Clit Rubbing Bonobos: A Clue to the Evolutionary Origin of Human Homosexuality?
- lastunicorn5 on In 1935, Were Cary Grant and Randolf Scott Sex Partners? No, But These Images Look Rather Camp
- Rhianna on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Nevaeh on Matthew 27:51-53: The Bible’s “Night of the Living Dead” Passage
- Dogwhistle politics explained on A List Of Republican Dog Whistles That No Longer Seem To Work
- Why Do Christian Fundamentalists Burn Books – theologyarchaeology on Does the Bible Advocate Book Burning?
- Philosophy homework help - Nursing Essays Center on Feminism for Beginners
- Philosophy homework help - Coursework Heros on Feminism for Beginners
- Pat on Voltaire: “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
- Answer the questions | Philosophy homework help | Writings Gate on Feminism for Beginners
- mike on Blogging UFOs: What Do You Make of Professor Robert Jacobs’s Bizarre UFO Testimony?
- Ray Léonard on In praise of Chateauneuf (Voltaire’s godfather and tutor)
Top Posts
- Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Clit Rubbing Bonobos: A Clue to the Evolutionary Origin of Human Homosexuality?
- Walt Whitman: "To be indeed a God!"
- What, Exactly, Is Wrong With Bestiality?
- Gay Marriage and Thomism
- Thomas Aquinas on Exterminating Heretics
- Donna Haraway: The Cyborg, Writing
- "The Vision of Christ That Thou Dost See": William Blake on the Many Faces of Jesus
- Pareidolia, Google Deep Dream, Wittgenstein's Aspect Seeing, and Friedrich Nietzsche
- "We Rule You, We Fool You": Classic 1911 Poster Depicting Capitalism Titled "Pyramid of Capitalist System"
-
Recent Posts
Recent Haiku Tweets
- @abrahampiper Yahweh as a frustrated deity, much to be pitied! Abraham Piper's insight here, if thought about as a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 year ago
- RT @tbonier: More than 80M votes cast and we're not done yet. Thoughts: - It's too late for an "October surprise" to have a significant imp… 1 year ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: 1. Want to thank @DanielNewman for using his HUGE platform for this work. I want to clarify what this is. In the voter… 1 year ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: Tell me again about how old and feeble Joe Biden is??? twitter.com/ProjectLincoln… 1 year ago
- RT @RachelBitecofer: Remember when you had a chance to choose country over party and you chose party @SenatorCollins? Well, @ProjectLincol… 1 year ago
Prometheus Unbound 
Andrew,
O’Donnell was interrupting and putting a lot of blue pipe smoke in the room, no doubt. Given our political culture, he won the exchange. But Schiff is a one trick pony. His bottom line in all his analysis is always the same: that you can’t borrow from Peter to pay Paul forever. You’ve got to produce, not just borrow and spend. Because you’re not doing that, the end is nigh.
But the end never comes because he’s not looking at the production side of the equation (which is, in fact, substantial). In a modern society, a lot gets produced and that means that, at the margins, a lot can be distributed. Medicare looks like it will bankrupt the system, and it could, but it won’t because politicians, when push comes to shove, will steer just clear of the brink.
Meanwhile, the US economy will rumble along at 2% growth (on average) for the next 50 years. Our children won’t live in a dystopia; they’ll live in a much richer society than the one we live in today. Doomsayers like Schiff make poor politicians, and O’Donnell illustrated that (even if it was a obnoxious and unfair in the way he did it). Being a purist ignores the way the game is played.
–Santi
Woah. I just posted that as a reminder that the notion of media as partisan propaganda is not some novel insight, but an obvious reality that saturates our ‘news’ coverage. That you actually believe the title of that video and think that O’Donnell won that exchange… man.
I left before the election because you had become some ranting tribalistic true believer, hardly worth my time. I figured that might pass when the passion of the election died down. Apparently the change was more substantial. Have a nice life.
Wow. You’re awfully prickly of late. At the level of rhetoric, O’Donnell cornered Schiff. I didn’t say he won the substantial argument (since none was possible by his cutting Schiff off).
My point is that, so long as the long trend in the economy is roughly 2% growth, politics in the United States is not likely to be receptive to Schiff-like libertarianism. Theoretically, if the world turned libertarian, economic growth might double to, say, 4% or more, but people are relatively content if things are generally moving in the growth direction. And if libertarian theory ever got put into practice, it might not work as well as you imagine.
–Santi