Below is one of the most amazing interview clips you’ll ever see. Tom Ricks, one of America’s most respected (and feared) investigative journalists, lasts 60 beautiful seconds on Fox News before the producer realizes he’s off script and shuts him down. This belongs in the category of, “Speak truth to power until your power goes out.”
Blog Stats
- 2,202,319 readers since June 2008
Recent Comments
- Zia on Adam and Eve’s Non-Existence Confirmed: Science 1, the Bible 0
- andrewclunn on First Debate: Hillary Owns Mr. KFC-for-Brains
- Bob Dine on What, Exactly, Is Wrong With Bestiality?
- Anonymous on Love is Worth Fighting For: A Little Life Lesson from Perseus and the Medusa
- Arkenaten on Adam and Eve’s Non-Existence Confirmed: Science 1, the Bible 0
- BJ on Clinton vs. Trump: It’s Late In The Game, Yet Still Close. How Can This Be?
- Jim on Clinton vs. Trump: It’s Late In The Game, Yet Still Close. How Can This Be?
- Amber on Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- Santi Tafarella on Clinton vs. Trump: It’s Late In The Game, Yet Still Close. How Can This Be?
- onereasonableperson on Clinton vs. Trump: It’s Late In The Game, Yet Still Close. How Can This Be?
- Santi Tafarella on Clinton vs. Trump: It’s Late In The Game, Yet Still Close. How Can This Be?
- onereasonableperson on Clinton vs. Trump: It’s Late In The Game, Yet Still Close. How Can This Be?
- The one on What is a Human, Really? Thinking about Definition via Aristotle
- International Psychoanalysis » Blog Archive » Philosophy Thursday: Adam Smith on Adam Smith and Capitalism for Beginners
- Ivan on Are Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity Religious Phonies?
Top Posts
- What is a Human, Really? Thinking about Definition via Aristotle
- Adam Smith and Capitalism for Beginners
- How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- Bearing Witness to the Holocaust: Children Lined up with Heads Shaved in a Croatian Concentration Camp
- Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- A Farmer's Wife and the Powerful Body of a Young Miller: Sexploitation of the Poor in a Marquis de Sade Short Story
- What is an Etiological Narrative? And Might Confusion About Its Nature Be the Source for Fundamentalist Religion?
- How Many People Could the Ancient Colosseum in Rome Hold?
- Charles Sanders Peirce on the Method of Tenacity
- Contemporary Liberalism Defined
-
Recent Posts
Recent Haiku Tweets
- RT @HillaryClinton: There's a reason the most hateful fringe of the right wing is supporting Donald Trump. amp.twimg.com/v/d0846c31-a8d… 1 month ago
- #DraftDodgerDonald This would make a great moniker for Trump: Draft Dodger Donald. santitafarella.wordpress.com/2016/05/31/dra… 4 months ago
- Life perspective. Sunset on Mars, taken by Curiosity. Monday is NASA's big press conference. wp.me/pgUXj-8tI via @wordpressdotcom 1 year ago
- RT @NewHorizons2015: http://t.co/uzrQF2kuh5 1 year ago
- From A Lion Behind A Bush To God Behind The Oz Curtain: The Evolution Of God Belief wp.me/pgUXj-8qV via @wordpressdotcom 1 year ago
Andrew,
O’Donnell was interrupting and putting a lot of blue pipe smoke in the room, no doubt. Given our political culture, he won the exchange. But Schiff is a one trick pony. His bottom line in all his analysis is always the same: that you can’t borrow from Peter to pay Paul forever. You’ve got to produce, not just borrow and spend. Because you’re not doing that, the end is nigh.
But the end never comes because he’s not looking at the production side of the equation (which is, in fact, substantial). In a modern society, a lot gets produced and that means that, at the margins, a lot can be distributed. Medicare looks like it will bankrupt the system, and it could, but it won’t because politicians, when push comes to shove, will steer just clear of the brink.
Meanwhile, the US economy will rumble along at 2% growth (on average) for the next 50 years. Our children won’t live in a dystopia; they’ll live in a much richer society than the one we live in today. Doomsayers like Schiff make poor politicians, and O’Donnell illustrated that (even if it was a obnoxious and unfair in the way he did it). Being a purist ignores the way the game is played.
–Santi
Woah. I just posted that as a reminder that the notion of media as partisan propaganda is not some novel insight, but an obvious reality that saturates our ‘news’ coverage. That you actually believe the title of that video and think that O’Donnell won that exchange… man.
I left before the election because you had become some ranting tribalistic true believer, hardly worth my time. I figured that might pass when the passion of the election died down. Apparently the change was more substantial. Have a nice life.
Wow. You’re awfully prickly of late. At the level of rhetoric, O’Donnell cornered Schiff. I didn’t say he won the substantial argument (since none was possible by his cutting Schiff off).
My point is that, so long as the long trend in the economy is roughly 2% growth, politics in the United States is not likely to be receptive to Schiff-like libertarianism. Theoretically, if the world turned libertarian, economic growth might double to, say, 4% or more, but people are relatively content if things are generally moving in the growth direction. And if libertarian theory ever got put into practice, it might not work as well as you imagine.
–Santi