Marco Rubio: “The Constitution of the United States” Forces Women to Bring to Term Rape and Incest Conceived Fetuses

Marco Rubio thinks “The Constitution of the United States” necessarily forces women to bring to term fetuses conceived against their will by rape and incest. Wow. He really fucked himself here.

About Santi Tafarella

I teach writing and literature at Antelope Valley College in California.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Marco Rubio: “The Constitution of the United States” Forces Women to Bring to Term Rape and Incest Conceived Fetuses

  1. Longtooth says:

    Its remarkable that no-choice people like Rubio predominantly also support capitol punishment and sending our Nation’s youth overseas to die foreign conflicts.

    • Santi Tafarella says:

      I agree. Women’s constitutional rights as citizens just crashed into the “rights” (elaborated where, but in religion?) of fetuses utterly dependent on the bodies of others to even exist. The fetuses are to be brought to term by unwilling women, some of whom have been impregnated by rape or incest. Rubio sides with “fetus rights” over women’s rights, brashly claiming the constitution for fetuses, but not actual female citizens. An honest person would say that we have the constitution over here, protecting women’s rights, and religion over here, asserting the prerogatives and agendas of those who advocate, solely for religious reasons, reproduction at any cost. Rubio turns the constitution into a document that weds church and state.

  2. Longtooth says:

    “Rubio turns the constitution into a document that weds church and state.”

    Social conservatives love to do exactly that. Because the phraseology “separation between church and state” isn’t found anywhere within, they assert that the Constitution’s mandate of separation between government and religion is a myth. Well, the wording “separation of powers” and “checks and balances” isn’t in there either. Does that mean that those properties of the Nation’s supreme law are myths too? But anyway, Rubio’s grind isn’t even about the rights of an unconscious, un-self aware developing fetus, but rather about some comingled DNA at the moment of fertilization. What’s next? Any human egg not brought to term is murder?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s