Tag Archives: apologetics

Thomas Aquinas for Beginners

Posted on January 6, 2015 by

Listening closely to theist arguments–and Aquinas. As an agnostic, I’m not sure whether God exists or not, nor whether Thomas Aquinas’s metaphysics is wholly correct, but I’m also not the sort of person who is interested in practicing confirmation bias … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Some Good Reasons to Think Adam and Eve Never Existed

Posted on December 28, 2014 by

First, there was never a bottleneck of two people that accounts for the diversity of humans living today. Second, geneticists tell us that the diversity of contemporary humans derives from no less than 12,500 black African ancestors, 2,500 of whom … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Who Shapes and Defines the Clay, and Who Cuts the Deck of Definition? Hylomorphism, Aquinas, Sartre, and Evolution

Posted on December 19, 2014 by

What is hylomorphism? Hylomorphism is a term out of classical philosophy (first used by Aristotle, later picked up by Aquinas) where a designer takes raw material and uses her mind and hands to impose purpose and form on it, as … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 53 Comments

Is God Just? And Where is Jesus?

Posted on December 18, 2014 by

In Summa Contra Gentiles, Book IV, ch. 52, here’s what Thomas Aquinas says is the sufficient reason for God withdrawing and withholding his protection from the descendants of Adam and Eve, leaving them exposed to dissolution (coming apart), degeneration, death, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Confidence Theists, Confidence Atheists, and Bayes’ Rule

Posted on December 8, 2014 by

As an agnostic, I think that both theists and atheists have reasons, some of them good, for believing what they do. It’s not just thoughtlessness or blind faith that causes someone to declare for theism or atheism. My issue is … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jesus, Original Sin, the Sufficient Reason for Suffering, and Thomas Aquinas

Posted on December 7, 2014 by

Jesus came and was crucified two thousand years ago. Wasn’t that supposed to quell God’s wrath against humanity? Jesus was supposed to have gone up to heaven in a cloud with the intention of being back quickly. He’s still not … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 24 Comments

David Berlinski defends God’s role in the Holocaust: “God did not protect his chosen people…[but] did…smite their enemies, with generations to come in mourning or obsessed by shame.”

Posted on November 27, 2014 by

Here’s David Berlinski defending God’s role in the Holocaust (from page 31 of his book, The Devil’s Delusion): “[T]he thousand year Reich…lies buried in the rubble of German cities smashed to smithereens,…[I]f God did not protect his chosen people precisely … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

If God is Rational, Whence the Holocaust and Competing Goods (Such as the Pursuit of Beauty over Ethics)?

Posted on November 22, 2014 by

Thomist philosopher Edward Feser prefers intellectualism (reason leading the will) to voluntarism (the will leading reason). He thinks that neither desire nor imagination should lead our wills, and claims that God, as the supremely rational being, ought to be our example: … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Holocaust

Posted on November 11, 2014 by

Here’s the problem concerning the principle of sufficient reason. If one posits that God has a good and sufficient reason for having allowed the Holocaust, the follow-up question obviously becomes, “Well, what is it?” Any particular answer proves woefully inadequate, ludicrous … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 22 Comments

Is God A Brute Fact Or Does God Not Exist?

Posted on October 26, 2014 by

If God exists, why is there some Being rather than no Being? Put another way, with regard to the existence of contingent beings (“Why is there something rather than nothing?”), God presumably functions as the necessary and sufficient cause for … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

What I Believe

Posted on August 10, 2014 by

I’m an agnostic. No superstitions. No spooks. I think there’s one world. No evidence for minds apart from brains. The form of theism that seems vaguely plausible to me is simple deism. I think it’s logically possible that there is … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Stockholm Syndrome and Religion

Posted on August 9, 2014 by

The Stockholm Syndrome is where love and threat are coming from the same source; it’s a form of hostage taking, and it’s what religions do emotionally with people when they make God the source of love and acceptance if you … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 16 Comments

God and Evolution?

Posted on July 13, 2014 by

As an agnostic, I never have any problem with somebody who says, “13.7 billion year-old cosmos and evolution, yes, obviously, but not, ‘It all happened via the combination of chance and natural selection.’ Something more is up, and I think … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

Un-Fricken-Believable

Posted on July 2, 2014 by

Seriously. __________ Okay, I have to comment. First, before you can even get this sort of logic going, Adam and Eve would need to have actually existed in a garden in Mesopotamia 10,000 years ago. They never did. Second, you’ve … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

God Exists And Evil Is Always For The Best?

Posted on June 23, 2014 by

Sounding like Dr. Pangloss in Voltaire’s Candide, the Thomist philosopher Edward Feser recently made the following statement at his blog: [I]t is not just God’s existence but also divine providence which can be known via purely philosophical arguments.  Hence, even … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Edward Feser Thinks God Flashed Fire Upon Elijah’s Sacrifice

Posted on May 14, 2014 by

Given the level of sophistication that the philosopher Edward Feser brings to his defense of medieval Thomism, I was somewhat taken aback recently to see him write at his blog the following: I think a divine cause was the source … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

God, The New Testament, And The Holocaust

Posted on April 30, 2014 by

It’s very, very hard to speak of God’s existence and of human history going according to a divine plan after the Holocaust. In 1945, Theodore Adorno famously said that it’s absurd to write poetry after the Holocaust, and it seems … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 23 Comments

Bart Ehrman: The Upton Sinclair of Jesus Studies

Posted on April 29, 2014 by

Look at the title of Bart Erhman’s new book in contrast with the title of its “flea” (the apologetic book that piggybacks on it): http://www.amazon.com/How-Jesus-Became-God-Exaltation/dp/0061778184/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1398779740&sr=8-1&keywords=bart+ehrman _________ http://www.amazon.com/How-God-Became-Jesus-Nature—-ebook/dp/B00I2P2OVS/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1398748855&sr=1-2&keywords=how+jesus+became+god+ehrman __________ Notice that Ehrman’s book title invites the reader to explore something available … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Does the Truth Matter or Not?

Posted on April 24, 2014 by

Catholic Andrew Sullivan, in the context of reading the biblical scholar Bart Erhman’s new book, How Jesus Became God (Harper 2014), makes a crisp and refreshingly direct statement to his fellow biblical religionists who ignore expert consensus and the general … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 11 Comments

God or the Multiverse: Who or What Banged the Big Bang?

Posted on April 3, 2014 by

Physicists Andrei Linde and Alan Guth “distorted by gravitational waves.” (HuffPost image.) __________ Cosmic background radiation has long been considered by physicists to be the smoking gun evidence for the big bang, but what about the recent discovery of bent … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments