Blog Stats
- 2,701,772 readers since June 2008
Recent Comments
- Anonymous on Blogging UFOs: What Do You Make of Professor Robert Jacobs’s Bizarre UFO Testimony?
- June Ellis on A Get Rich Quick Scheme Using Religion That Actually Works
- Anonymous on How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- Anonymous on How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- Kathleen Manzie on Adam and Eve and White Racism
- Anonymous on La Brea Tar Pits’ Page Science Museum sells a pseudoscience product—“Mystery Marbles”—at its museum store
- telizzy on La Brea Tar Pits’ Page Science Museum sells a pseudoscience product—“Mystery Marbles”—at its museum store
- Anonymous on La Brea Tar Pits’ Page Science Museum sells a pseudoscience product—“Mystery Marbles”—at its museum store
- JC on How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- Pauline McCaleb on How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- Anonymous on How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- Roland Henderson on How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- Peter on Matthew 27:51-53: The Bible’s “Night of the Living Dead” Passage
- Santi Tafarella on Saint Ranieri, Meet George Jetson: Deconstruction Illustrated with a Catholic Painting
- slmontgomery on Electroshock Therapy For Homosexuals?
Top Posts
- Emily Dickinson, Lesbian?: Her Letter to Susan Gilbert, in June of 1852, Might Tell Us Less Than You Think
- How Crazy is Dr. David Jeremiah?
- What, Exactly, Is Wrong With Bestiality?
- What is a Human, Really? Thinking about Definition via Aristotle
- Matthew 27:51-53: The Bible's "Night of the Living Dead" Passage
- Ludwig Wittgenstein for Beginners
- Walt Whitman: "To be indeed a God!"
- Is God Necessary for Morality?
- Clit Rubbing Bonobos: A Clue to the Evolutionary Origin of Human Homosexuality?
- Lancaster Mayor R. Rex Parris: Is This What a Rising Christian Political Star Looks Like?
-
Recent Posts
- A Mini-Course In Rhetoric For Writers. Concept 2.10: Emerson’s “Circles”
- A Mini-Course In Rhetoric For Writers. Concept 2.9: Imitation And Emulation With An Eye On Competition
- A Mini-Course In Rhetoric For Writers. Concept 2.8: Selection And Editing
- A Mini-Course In Rhetoric For Writers. Concept 2.7: Audience And Rhetorical Strategy
- A Mini-Course In Rhetoric For Writers. Concept 2.6: Moving From First Sentence To Thesis
Recent Haiku Tweets
- AOC says it well. twitter.com/CNN/status/108… 7 months ago
- nytimes.com/interactive/20… 1 year ago
- RT @mrchan: So much has changed in America, and yet so much hasn't https://t.co/x2mthUr4Kc 1 year ago
- Perfect. twitter.com/newsundayheral… 2 years ago
- RT @goldenglobes: At tonight's #GoldenGlobes we honor Hollywood legend Meryl Streep with the prestigious Cecil B. Demille Award. https://t.… 2 years ago
Tag Archives: intelligent design
Psychopathic Trolls and The Dark Tetrad
Chris Mooney at Slate reports on some actual psychological research that has been done on Internet trolls: [R]esearch, conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba and two colleagues, sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged atheism, evolution, intelligent design, psychopathy, rhetoric, science, Ted Cruz, The Dark Tetrad, trolls
9 Comments
Why I Prefer Evolution to Intelligent Design
First, it is perverse to reject evolution outright. Darwin was largely right, and people who try to reset science to pre-Darwinian assumptions are engaged in folly. The converging lines of evidence from numerous scientific disciplines point to the fact that … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged apologetics, atheism, biology, evolution, faith, intelligent design, reason, science, theism
5 Comments
Is Our Universe A Computer Simulation?
In the above image snapped at the Getty Villa in Malibu, poor crocodile is no crocodile at all, but the representation of a crocodile; the simulacrum of a crocodile. Might you be a simulacrum as well? This post is about … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged atheism, evolution, intelligent design, Matrix, multiverse, philosophy, physics, the library of babel, the matrix
3 Comments
Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Watch: Junk DNA is Not Junk
This is in the New York Times today: The human genome is packed with at least four million gene switches that reside in bits of DNA that once were dismissed as “junk” but that turn out to play critical roles … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged atheism, atheist, biology, Charles Darwin, evolution, God, intelligent design, junk DNA
28 Comments
Naturalism, Supernaturalism, and Motivated Reasoning
At the ID website, Uncommon Descent, a person who goes by the name of “Mirrortothesun” makes the following thread comment: Here’s the problem with every single post on this site, including this one. They are all examples of motivated reasoning. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged apologetics, atheism, atheist, Charles Darwin, creationism, critical thinking, evolution, Genesis, intelligent design
Leave a comment
Was the Cambrian Explosion Really an Explosion?
Donald Prothero, a paleontologist, knows his fossils. And, in 2007, Columbia University Press published his book, Evolution: What the Fossils Say and Why It Matters. For it’s scope, clarity of writing, and visual attractiveness (it has lots of illustrative drawings, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged apologetics, atheism, atheist, biology, cambrian explosion, evolution, gradualism, intelligent design, science, stephen gould
7 Comments
Dead Parrot Watch: The Multiverse Appears To Be in Trouble. Does That Mean Atheism Is in Trouble Too?
In 2008, cosmologist Bernard Carr of Queen Mary University of London, told a science journalist for Discover the following: If there is only one universe, you might have to have a fine-tuner. If you don’t want God, you’d better have a … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged apologetics, atheism, atheist, design, God, intelligent design, jerry coyne, multiverse, philosophy, physics
29 Comments
Is the Placebo Effect a Problem for Atheism?
Catholic journalist Denise O’Leary seems quite persuaded that the placebo effect stubbornly resists any plausible materialist explanation, and so is a problem for atheists. (O’Leary wrote, with a neuroscientist by the name of Mario Beauregard, an interesting book a few years back … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged atheism, atheist, denise o'leary, intelligent design, mind, neuroscience, placebo effects, psychology, the soul
3 Comments
Evolution v. Creation Watch: Felisa Wolfe-Simon on the Implications of Arsenic Based Life
In the below BBC clip for an upcoming special on whether there is life on other planets, Felisa Wolfe-Simon says something to the interviewer that ought to blow everyone away. If what she has indeed recently found at Mono Lake is … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged abiogenesis, astrobiology, atheism, atheist, biology, evolution, felisa wolfe-simon, Genesis, God, intelligent design, mono lake, science
2 Comments
William Dembski: Noah’s Flood May Have Been Global
At Panda’s Thumb Jack Krebs has an interesting post on the famous IDer, William Dembski, and his apparent drift towards belief in young earth creationism, including the idea that Noah’s Flood was a global historical event. Krebs, for example, quotes William Dembski recently … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged atheism, evolution, fundamentalism, Genesis, geology, intelligent design, noah's flood, religion, science, william dembski
2 Comments
Intelligent Design v. The Multiverse Hypothesis: Astronomer John Gribbin Cleverly Splits the Difference Between Them
At the UK’s Telegraph, astronomer John Gribbin puts an intelligent design twist on the multiverse hypothesis: he writes that it’s possible—indeed, plausible—that “a very advanced civilisation”, knowing how to birth new universes via the creation of black holes, designed our universe with life-friendly … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged agnosticism, apologetics, atheism, atheist, evolution, Genesis, intelligent design, john gribbin, multiverse hypothesis, Stephen Hawking, the big bang
3 Comments
Go West, Young Species? Like Ulysses and Darwin, Launch Out?
Exploiting an open territory appears to be a larger driver of big evolutionary changes than getting into an already crowded market and competing for local territorial niches, suggests a new scientific study that, at first glance, might seem to contradict Charles Darwin’s … Continue reading
Evolution v. Creation Watch: The Cambrian Explosion (545 Million Years Ago), the Cambridge Explosion (1869), and Natural Selection Replaced by the Eschaton?
Here is a depiction of the HMS Cambridge firing a torpedo (Illustrated London News, 1869): And here’s a fossil from the Cambrian explosion (image source: Wikipedia). . And here’s my question: does the Cambrian explosion (the relatively sudden appearance of … Continue reading
Jerry Coyne v. Jerry Fodor: The Great Divorce
Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini’s book, What Darwin Got Wrong (2010), received a fair amount of attention (and drubbing) when it first came out in February. On Tuesday of this week, evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne expressed dismay that Jerry Fodor, in a recent interview, continues … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged apologetics, atheism, biology, Charles Darwin, contingency, evolution, intelligent design, jerry coyne, jerry fodor, natural selection, philosophy, science
3 Comments
Stairway to Gilligan’s Island: Jason Rosenhouse and Auguste Comte on Theology v. Science
At EvolutionBlog, Jason Rosenhouse takes after theology’s shell game: If theology must change every time scientists achieve consensus on something, then what good is it? If it is only allowed to make assertions about things that are completely divorced from … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged auguste comte, biology, Charles Darwin, creationism, evolution, gilligan's island, God, intelligent design, jason rosenhouse, philosophy, science, theology
11 Comments
The Holographic Universe: the Unbreakable Lightness of Being?
After reading yesterday’s mind-bending New York Times article on gravity (and the possibility that we live in a holographic universe), I think I’ve put it all together. But I need a very smart physicists or science oriented person to set … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged astronomy, creation, david bohm, evolution, Genesis, holism, holographic universe, intelligent design, origins, physics, the universe
3 Comments
Why neither intelligent design nor young earth creationism can ever function as part of the sciences
I’ve always liked this cartoon:
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged apologetics, biologos, Charles Darwin, creation, evolution, Genesis, God, intelligent design, miracles, philosophy, science, the Bible
1 Comment
This religious epidural is brought to you by Francisco Ayala
Geneticist Francisco Ayala, introduced with some soothing piano and string music, takes on the manner of a family physician, assuring his jittery audience of nonexperts that everything is just fine; there is no conflict between science and religion (and we can … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged apologetics, atheist, biology, Charles Darwin, evolution, francisco ayala, intelligent design, jerry coyne, Nietzsche, NOMA, science, stephen gould
6 Comments
Equal time alongside global warming: biblical armageddon theory comes to the classroom
Teach the controversy? I love the science-and-religion-in-harmony diorama at the 1:20 mark. Did you catch it? It has two smiling scientists and a priest glibly declaring—“We can all agree”—as a meteor hurdles toward Earth.
Backward Causation: William Dembski’s Desperate Ad Hoc Move, Ctd
One more thought on William Dembski’s recently published idea of “backward causation,” a term that he designates for salvaging the idea that death really did come into the world by the sin of Adam and Eve. Would you propose such a thing, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Adam and Eve, adam's sin, agnosticism, America, apologetics, atheism, culture, fundamentalism, Genesis, intelligent design, the Bible, william dembski
Leave a comment
