Thomistic Essentialism and Sex in the Real World

Virtually every healthy human adult on the planet has a sex life of some sort, and the effect of Thomistic sexual ideology (use sex organs for procreation only), were it to be seriously followed everywhere, would be the generation of larger families. There’s a reason that those promoting a deceleration of population growth globally see problems with the Catholic Church’s stance on condom distribution in poorer countries (for example).

I don’t necessarily agree with those promoting population deceleration, but the effect of religious ideologies on the question is clear (most especially in Islam and Christianity).

By 2100 demographers tell us that 90% of the human population will live in cities. Urban mores are simply not very conducive to the sorts of sex restrictions promoted by traditional Thomism. Niche groups of Catholic conservatives might be able to maintain the old time religious values on sex, but it’s largely unattractive (and too difficult) for most.

Perhaps the model for future Catholics will be to study the Hasidic enclaves in New York, for how does one maintain traditional Catholic values in the midst of big cities? The shutting of 50 parishes around NYC this past week suggests it isn’t easy.

Catholicism works best (obviously) for rural societies where women are not equal to men and teens are married off by age 15. The lives of women professionally would be profoundly restricted by adopting Thomistic notions surrounding sex, and the urban future is going to belong to white collar women delaying and controlling their fertility for careers, etc. (The demographics and sociology of this is well covered in Hanna Rosin’s book, The End of Men.)

But it’s also obvious that there needs to be people in the world who believe deeply in an ideology of reproduction and big families. Western countries are trying to strike a balance here. Gays and women (for example) are protected in their rights for the first time in human history, and those who want to raise large families and adhere to old school religious ideologies like Thomism are free to do their thing as well. Let freedom ring.

My own evolving take is that, much as I think it would advance the liberty of gay Catholics to have a religion that let them marry within the Church, there’s also a part of me that says the following: Catholicism has evolved a pretty successful cultural strategy for maintaining its percentage of population at around 15-20% of the globe, and somebody’s going to need to make babies in the West if too many urban professionals largely opt out. So let a thousand evolutionary strategies bloom. The big brain can do its thing in the city centers, science labs, universities, and marketplaces, and religious communities can reify their way of life as the “best and most natural.” In this way, our species benefits from the best of both worlds. Let gays, professional women, and traditionalists bloom. It’s the sort of “rapprochement” that is evolving anyway. Who’s going to stop it? Why would we want to?

And within the Church itself, it may be too much to expect traditionalists to not jump ship if Thomistic essentialism is abandoned or relaxed too much. Conservative Catholicism is at bottom patriarchal and oriented to making large families. It’s attractive to conservatives for these reasons. Conservatives don’t want women priests, gay marriage, divorced people taking communion, teens masturbating without guilt, etc., and they’ll vote with their feet and funds if the Catholic Church ever goes down such a road.

The bottom line here (for me) is that Thomists may be correct that things have “real essences,” but when it comes to the real essence of the human brain and what should be its prerogatives and orientations, the question is by no means straightforward, but complicated, and to acknowledge the degree of complication underlying our own evolutionary strategy (delay fertility for longer goals, etc.) would decelerate the Catholic population. Thomists therefore simplify narratives around the “right use” of the brain, penis, and vagina in a way that doesn’t rock the demographic and traditionalist boat for Catholicism, thereby committing them to a form of fake essentialism on matters of sex.

About Santi Tafarella

I teach writing and literature at Antelope Valley College in California.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Thomistic Essentialism and Sex in the Real World

  1. colinhutton says:

    Thought provoking. I’m thinking!

    • colinhutton says:

      After thinking, and remembering what I,d read somewhere about Italy:

      You say “….. somebody’s going to need to make babies in the West if too many urban professionals largely opt out”

      My reading of that, in its context, is that in a sense you see outsourcing of baby-making to devout catholics as a solution to continuing declines in future fertility rates. If I’m reading you correctly, and bearing in mind that a fertility rate of around 2.2 is needed to maintain a static population (higher in third-world countries with high mortality rates), then I don’t think so.

      Percentage of population that is catholic :
      Italy 97%; Spain 88%; Brazil 79%; Ireland 84%; UK 9%; Bangladesh 0%; Afghanistan 0%.
      Fertility rates:
      Italy 1.5; Spain 1.5; Brazil 1.8; Ireland 2.0; UK 1.9; Bangladesh 2.2; Afghanistan 5.0

      (Wikipedia, but in there from good sources. CC itself claims some higher percentage shares, but that doesn’t change the picture. Non- random selection by me, but no deliberate distortion).

      On any reading of the numbers, catholics are not taking much notice of what the old guys in the Vatican say about reproduction. ( Nor are the old guys leading by example. Or if they are they are not letting on. The corresponding figures for Vatican City are listed as 100% and – )

      • Santi Tafarella says:

        I’m fascinated by how metaphysics and sex are interconnected. Abandon metaphysical essentialism (“the penis is for procreation, therefore…”), and the whole edifice of justification for restrictions on sexual behavior and birth control collapses. And then this has demographic consequences.

  2. colinhutton says:

    Having concluded some years ago that the whole metaphysical enterprise is a complete nonsense, I can personally endorse the ‘moral’ consequences you hypothesize. As to the demographic consequences, those are interesting to contemplate. A very rough calculation suggests, ceteris paribus, that if the global population peaks at, say, 10 billion this century and average fertility rates have fallen (Insha’Allah) to 1.5, it would then, for example, take only around 100 years for the population to drop to around 4 billion. Of course, only in your dreams (nightmares?) will all other thing stay the same.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s