Monthly Archives: November 2014

What’s God’s Sufficient Reason for the Evil in the World? And If You Can’t Think of Any, Should You Still Believe in God?

Posted on November 30, 2014 by

The principle of sufficient reason (PSR). God must have a sufficient reason for withdrawing and withholding his protection from the descendants of Adam for so tortuously long; for allowing them to encounter the full force of a psychopath’s or nature’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Foxy Sex vs. Hedgehog Sex: Free Will, Edward Feser, and Evolution

Posted on November 30, 2014 by

Thomist philosopher Edward Feser has a curious way of defining free will and what it’s for, writing in a recent blog post the following: “[O]n the conception of free will as ‘freedom for excellence,’ which is endorsed by Aquinas, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arguing about Gay Marriage with Thomists: Love vs. Reproduction

Posted on November 30, 2014 by

The premises underlying Thomistic arguments against gay marriage are four: sex’s goal should be directed ultimately to reproduction; marriage is for the rearing of children and the union of man and woman; marriage is naturally a social institution for promoting … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

What’s a Penis, and What’s It for? Thomas Aquinas vs. Ludwig Wittgenstein

Posted on November 29, 2014 by

What’s better: to see a thing as having both essential and accidental features, and placing it in a genus-species hierarchy (Thomas Aquinas’ view), or to drop hierarchy and essentialism in definition altogether, and just see a thing as sharing “family … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Potency, Act, and the Withdrawal of Grace: Thomas Aquinas on Original Sin

Posted on November 29, 2014 by

Here’s Thomas Aquinas in Summa Contra Gentiles, Book IV, ch. 52: “[We Christians] affirm that man was, from the beginning, so fashioned that as long as his reason was subject to God, not only would his lower powers serve him without … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Aztec Sun God and Jesus the Son of God Bled for You. Feel Guilty? Ready to Sacrifice Your Life to Them? Then the Stories Worked!

Posted on November 28, 2014 by

The Aztec worship of their sun god was rather barbaric because humans were sacrificed to the god. The rationale for this sacrifice had to do with Aztec myth, which held that the sun god sacrificed his very own blood to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

David Berlinski defends God’s role in the Holocaust: “God did not protect his chosen people…[but] did…smite their enemies, with generations to come in mourning or obsessed by shame.”

Posted on November 27, 2014 by

Here’s David Berlinski defending God’s role in the Holocaust (from page 31 of his book, The Devil’s Delusion): “[T]he thousand year Reich…lies buried in the rubble of German cities smashed to smithereens,…[I]f God did not protect his chosen people precisely … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Charles Darwin vs. Thomas Aquinas: What Follows from Our Nature?

Posted on November 23, 2014 by

At his blog recently, Thomist philosopher Edward Feser wrote the following: “For Aquinas, what is good for us is necessarily good for us because it follows from our nature. As such, even God couldn’t change it, any more than he … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

If God is Rational, Whence the Holocaust and Competing Goods (Such as the Pursuit of Beauty over Ethics)?

Posted on November 22, 2014 by

Thomist philosopher Edward Feser prefers intellectualism (reason leading the will) to voluntarism (the will leading reason). He thinks that neither desire nor imagination should lead our wills, and claims that God, as the supremely rational being, ought to be our example: … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Whatever Works: Pierce’s Abduction, Darwin’s Evolution, Entropy, Bayes’ Rule, and Rorty’s Pragmatism

Posted on November 21, 2014 by

I’ve recently been struck by the similarity between Charles Sanders Pierce’s notion of abduction (reasoning to the best hypothesis; “may the best hypothesis win”), Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution (survival of the fittest; “may the best organism win”), entropy (what … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

What Does It Mean To Be An Agnostic?

Posted on November 17, 2014 by

I’m an agnostic, which for me means the following: I take it that there is only one way the cosmos actually is, and I don’t know what that one way is. There are a gazillion logically possible ways it could … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 13 Comments

Thomas Aquinas on Exterminating Heretics

Posted on November 16, 2014 by

In the Summa, Thomas Aquinas says that you can reason with someone who holds a different doctrine from yours so long as that person is open and searching. On the other hand, if the person persists in his view, and does … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Holocaust

Posted on November 11, 2014 by

Here’s the problem concerning the principle of sufficient reason. If one posits that God has a good and sufficient reason for having allowed the Holocaust, the follow-up question obviously becomes, “Well, what is it?” Any particular answer proves woefully inadequate, ludicrous … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 22 Comments

Who Is William Blake, Really?

Posted on November 9, 2014 by

William Blake is a poet, not a metaphysician. When someone writes with aphorism, irony, and wild and flamboyant system building (as Blake and Nietzsche did), they are mocking essentialism; they’re showing that language is infinite; that there are a gazillion … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

What are Sex Organs “For”? Thomism vs. Evolution

Posted on November 9, 2014 by

We know that evolution high-jacks organs all the time to different purposes depending on context. The first tongue may have had the singular purpose of tasting, then it got used by the cat for cleaning the pelt, then by humans … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What Love Is (A Definition)

Posted on November 4, 2014 by

What is love? I’d basically put it among the very broad family of “the better angels of our nature,” and in the genus of “seeking connection, harmony, and cooperation in a non-zero sum way.” As to the species of this … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Thomistic Essentialism and Sex in the Real World

Posted on November 3, 2014 by

Virtually every healthy human adult on the planet has a sex life of some sort, and the effect of Thomistic sexual ideology (use sex organs for procreation only), were it to be seriously followed everywhere, would be the generation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Sex, Thomistic Essentialism, and the Demographic Maintenance of the Catholic Church

Posted on November 1, 2014 by

With regard to sex, Thomism is a question-begging exercise that puts a veneer of essentialist metaphysics over the question, “Why is God upset if humans don’t make use of their sex organs in accord with their primary and essential function?” … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment