Iran vs. Israel in 2012: Cuban Missile Crisis 2.0?

The Jerusalem Post today quotes Wim Kortenoeven expressing concern over Israel’s ongoing existence should Iran acquire nuclear weapons. Kortenoeven, described by the Post as “a leading expert on the Middle East” and an official of Holland’s Party of Freedom, is quoted saying the following:

“The Iranian threat to annihilate six million Jews is a moral call to us. It is an Auschwitz in the making. We take this threat seriously. History forces us to do that. It happened before and the West did nothing to stop it.”

He continued, “In the debate, I referred to the ships that were crossing oceans and seas, filled with Jews trying to escape the Nazis, but ending up in Hamburg or being torpedoed in the Black See. The St. Louis and the Struma. Perhaps I also should have referred to the Evian Conference of 1938.

There the free West effectively turned its back on the Jews, making nice statements but offering nothing substantial to save them, and bluntly refusing to go to the hilt in stopping the Nazi menace.

The similarity is very disturbing and very real.”

In other words, Wim Kortenoeven frames the Iranian-Israeli stand-off, metaphorically, in World War II terms.

But what if he’s wrong? What if the Iranian-Israeli stand-off is better framed as akin to the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, with Bibi Netanyahu as General Curtis LeMay and not Winston Churchill? (For those who don’t know, LeMay was one of President Kennedy’s generals at the time of the Cuban missile crisis. He was the lead person clamoring for a massive air strike on Cuba.)

2012 looks to be shaping up as a very, very nervy year. WWII or Cuban missile crisis 2.0?

About Santi Tafarella

I teach writing and literature at Antelope Valley College in California.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Iran vs. Israel in 2012: Cuban Missile Crisis 2.0?

  1. babul says:

    I think that america is a brusterd country. recent situation all of the peice of the world they Distroyed. so I want to fuck america and their foreign policy. In ward i want say they are son of bitch. fuck them because they are enemy of humanity.

    • Anonymous says:

      I’m sorry, but your pure lack of intelligence is evident in the fact that you don’t know how to spell the word “destroyed” properly, as well as your lacking of plural noun conjugation. Talk all you want, but you won’t get anywhere until you take some grammar lessons and learn to speak with some relative intelligence.

  2. Okpanz says:

    Muslims all over the whole wide world are all the same, blood suckers, violent people, anti-development, imagine Nigeria case … in fact every Muslim is a taut. this is a pure fact

  3. Anonymous says:

    Generalizing 1.3 billion people as “blood suckers, violent people” and “anti-development” is a pretty big step. You ought to think about what you say before you spew it out of your mouth, and maybe even do a little research. For instance, you do realize that the prophet of the Muslims, Muhammad, basically condemned acts of terrorism? Or that the group that is doing the terrorism makes up for less then 1% of the Muslim population? Just some food for thought…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s